By Samson Abramsky, Juha Kontinen, Jouko Väänänen, Heribert Vollmer
In this quantity, varied points of logics for dependence and independence are mentioned, together with either the logical and computational facets of dependence common sense, and likewise functions in a few parts, resembling information, social selection concept, databases, and machine defense. The contributing authors symbolize major specialists during this rather new box, each one of whom was once invited to jot down a bankruptcy according to talks given at seminars held on the Schloss Dagstuhl Leibniz middle for Informatics in Wadern, Germany (in February 2013 and June 2015) and an Academy Colloquium on the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (March 2014). Altogether, those chapters give you the latest examine this constructing and hugely interdisciplinary box and should be of curiosity to a large team of logicians, mathematicians, statisticians, philosophers, and scientists. issues lined include
- a entire survey of many propositional, modal, and first-order variations of dependence logic;
- new effects bearing on expressive energy of numerous editions of dependence common sense with diversified units of logical connectives and generalized dependence atoms;
- connections among inclusion common sense and the least-fixed aspect logic;
- an assessment of dependencies in databases by means of addressing the relationships among implication difficulties for fragments of statistical conditional independencies, embedded multivalued dependencies, and propositional logic;
- various Markovian types used to symbolize dependencies and causality between variables in multivariate systems;
- applications of dependence good judgment in social selection conception; and
- an creation to the speculation of mystery sharing, stating connections to dependence and independence logic.
Read Online or Download Dependence Logic: Theory and Applications PDF
Best logic & language books
During this textbook, Michael Morris deals a serious creation to the significant problems with the philosophy of language. every one bankruptcy focusses on one or texts that have had a seminal impression on paintings within the topic, and makes use of those as a fashion of drawing close either the imperative issues and some of the traditions of facing them.
This e-book develops the final ideas of linguistic swap that shape the rules of old linguistics, dialectology and sociolinguistics. it truly is involved in the criteria that govern the inner improvement of linguistic buildings: the mechanisms of switch, the restrictions on switch, and the ways that switch is embedded within the higher linguistic procedure.
Extra info for Dependence Logic: Theory and Applications
U)X v. Suppose then u»v. , u)X v. t u Corollary 1. For every closure operation cl there is a team X such that cl is the team closure operation clX . Note that if I is finite, the team X constructed in the above theorem is also finite. On the other hand, if I is the set of all complex numbers and cl is the algebraic closure, then the team X has continuum size. In summary, there are two alternative approaches to dependence: the closure operation approach and the dependence relation approach. Both approaches can be subsumed under the team semantics approach.
1 Introduction In 1939  the mathematician and logician Kurt Grelling1 developed, in co-operation with Paul Oppenheim2, a completely abstract theory of dependence and independence with apparently no connection to algebra or probability theory, although a study of dependence was emerging in these fields too. His starting point seems to have been the so-called Gestalt Theory , but his prime example was the earthly way in which commercial price depends on supply and demand. This paper will present an overview of Grelling’s theory.
Inf. Control. 68 (1-3), 86–104 (1986). 1016/S0019-9958(86)80029-8. 1016/S00199958(86)80029-8 37. : Coherence and computational complexity of quantifier-free dependence logic formulas. Stud. Logica 101(2), 267–291 (2013) 38. : Team logic and second-order logic. Fundamenta Informaticae 106 (2–4), 259–272 (2011) 39. : On definability in dependence logic. J. Log. Lang. Inf. 18(3), 317–332 (2009) 40. : Complexity of two-variable dependence logic and if-logic. Inf. Comput. 239, 237–253 (2014). 004. http://dx.